News: This section can be used for brief news announcements
  First Name:  Last Name:
Log In
Advanced Search
Surnames
What's New
Most Wanted
  • Photos
  • Documents
  • Headstones
  • Histories
  • Recordings
  • Videos
  • Albums
    All Media
    Cemeteries
    Places
    Notes
    Dates and Anniversaries
    Calendar
    Reports
    Sources
    Repositories
    DNA Tests
    Statistics
    Change Language
    Bookmarks
    Contact Us
    Register for a User Account

    Isabella HORSLEY

    Female 1858 -


    Personal Information    |    Notes    |    All    |    PDF

    • Name Isabella HORSLEY 
      Born 1858  Hartlepool, Co Durham Find all individuals with events at this location 
      Gender Female 
      Person ID I934  Horsley
      Last Modified 27 Dec 2006 

      Father James HORSLEY,   b. 1839, Hartlepool, Co Durham Find all individuals with events at this location,   d. (SEP QTR.1879), Hartlepool, Co Durham Find all individuals with events at this location 
      Notes 
      • 1851 Census, Hartlepool District
        Family Number: 41707.5
        1851 Census, Hartlepool Township - Sussex Street (HO107/2384, Folio 242, Page 29 & Folio 243, Page 30)
        Richard Horsley, Head, married, 47, Fisherman, born Hartlepool, County Durham
        Isabella Horsley, Wife, married, 45, born Hartlepool, County Durham
        Ann J. Horsley, daughter, unmarried, 18, employed at home, born Hartlepool, County Durham
        James Horsley, son, 12, Scholar, born Hartlepool, County Durham
        Richard Horsley, son, 9, Scholar, born Hartlepool, County Durham
        Margaret Horsley, daughter, 6, born Hartlepool, County Durham
        Ann Johnson, sister-in-law, unmarried, 60, Fisher Labourer (lodger), born Hartlepool, County Durham
        John Johnson, nephew, 8, Scholar, born Hartlepool, County Durham
      Family ID F515  Group Sheet  |  Family Chart

    • Notes 
      • 1881 census Hpool. an Isabella Horsley living at 13 Sussex St in household of unmarried Richard 1014 described as his neice, she may be the same as 1861 census shown as aged 3 with him and his brother James 1015. But there is a diff. of two years. Her mother 1007 would have been aged 53 at the birth. It seems more likely that she is the daughter of his brother James or that she is the illegit child of Mary, (Richard's sister).